Health care law rollout woes may delay fine provision
WASHINGTON — Lawmakers from both major political parties on Sunday expressed concern over the botched rollout of the new federal health insurance website, with two Senate Democrats saying the problems are serious enough to justify delays to key provisions of the president's health care law.
Republicans, meanwhile, said the issues are symptomatic of larger problems with the law and that many of the disadvantages of the program are becoming apparent now that people are starting to be able to see the quality and cost of the coverage available under the law.
Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., took to the Sunday talk shows to press for legislation that they said would give people more time to comply with a rule requiring most Americans to carry health insurance starting next year or face a fine.
Manchin advocated for a bill delaying the so-called individual mandate for a year. Shaheen proposed extending the open enrollment period beyond its current end date of March 31 to account for all the people who have not been able to buy coverage because of problems with the online shopping site, HealthCare.gov.
“My goal is to fix the Affordable Care Act to make sure those people can get that access to health care,” Shaheen said on CBS' “Face the Nation.”
She said the rollout of the marketplace has been a “disaster” because so many people have been thwarted by technological glitches as they try to view plan options and prices and enroll in coverage. With a month of the open enrollment period nearly over, it's only fair to extend that period, she said.
The Obama administration so far has dismissed proposals to extend any deadlines. On Friday, officials said they would fix the site by the end of November, giving people four months to buy coverage before they incur a penalty of as much as 1 percent of their income.
Insurers object to any delays in the mandate or penalty, partly because they set their prices for next year under the assumption that large numbers of young and healthy people, who are cheap to insure, would be compelled by the law to join their patient pools.
Neither Democrat echoed some Republicans' calls for Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to resign. On ABC's “This Week,” Manchin said he has faith in her ability to lead the implementation.
Shaheen said the focus should be on fixing the website. “There's going to be plenty of time to place blame on who is responsible,” she said.
Meanwhile, people logging on to the new federal health insurance website on Sunday encountered a new home page — one that does not feature the smiling brunette whose happy disposition stuck a discordant note for people unable to access the site.
Gone, too, are the cheery pair on the page where users choose their state. In their place are four new logos, each highlighting a different way that consumers can apply for insurance coverage. The bright circles each link to a different option: the website, paper application, phone line and in-person assisters.
“HealthCare.gov is a dynamic website,” HHS spokeswoman Joanne Peters said in a statement. “As with all websites, we try to make meaningful enhancements and improvements that will help users understand key information, while maintaining the overall familiar design and navigation elements that are working well.”
Several Republicans said the site's problems were minor compared with larger problems with the program.
“The president made promises that this was going to be cheaper than your cellphone bill, easier to use than Amazon, and you can keep your doctor,” Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., told host George Stephanopoulos on “This Week.” “People all across the country, George, are seeing that's just not true.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. to arm Iraq’s Sunni tribesmen
- D.C. charges woman over armed protest
- Locavore movement takes to deer hunting across country
- 3-mile buffer suggested for grouse breeding, oil and gas drilling
- Man sets house fire, kills deputy
- New nuke carrier will arrive late, incomplete
- Bighorn sheep escapes Los Angeles Zoo
- Plan in works to speed up schools’ Internet service
- GOP hopes backlash doesn’t backfire
- Ferguson, Mo., grand jury to meet Monday, decide on possible indictment of police officer
- Off-duty officer fatally shot in Akron, Ohio, pub