Former Ariz. lawmaker sent to prison
TUCSON — A federal judge on Monday sentenced former U.S. Rep. Rick Renzi to three years in prison for convictions on public corruption, money laundering and other charges, capping a corruption case prosecutors said began more than a decade ago.
U.S. District Judge David C. Bury sentenced Renzi co-defendant James Sandlin to 18 months in prison and ordered both men to pay fines. They are to begin their prison terms in January.
“I'm not wise enough to know why good people do bad things — I think character and avarice have something to do with it,” Bury said. “That's what happened here. Two good men committed bad acts.”
Renzi, a Republican, represented Arizona's sprawling 1st District from early 2003 until early 2009. He chose not to run for re-election in 2008 while awaiting federal indictment.
A federal jury in Tucson convicted him in June on 17 of 32 counts, including wire fraud, conspiracy, extortion, racketeering, money laundering and making false statements to insurance regulators. He was acquitted on the remaining counts.
Prosecutors said Renzi, 55, now of Burke, Va., looted a family insurance business to help pay for his 2002 campaign.
He was convicted of filing false statement with regulators.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Man caught jumping White House fence
- Judge orders W.Va. agency to release pollution data
- Coast Guard to seek billions to protect Arctic interests
- Academic scandal at University of North Carolina bigger than previously reported
- Ferguson slaying of Brown reconstructed in county autopsy
- Social Security recipients to get increase in benefits
- Security at Capitol questioned
- Immigration work permits could rise under contract
- Coburn’s final ‘Wastebook’ tallies $25B in what he considers ‘pork’
- Official’s job at cybersecurity firm vexes NSA
- Personal use of Secret Service agents on staffer’s behalf draws investigaton