Share This Page

Students' public sex act near Ohio campus won't result in charges

| Monday, Oct. 28, 2013, 8:24 p.m.

ATHENS, Ohio — A grand jury decided not to charge anyone in a public sex act near Ohio University that was photographed by witnesses and later reported by the woman involved as a sexual assault once images circulated on social media, a prosecutor said on Monday.

Athens County Prosecutor Keller Blackburn said the grand jury determined there wasn't probable cause to file charges. The case involved a man and woman who were photographed and recorded in a sex act against the window of a bank near the southern Ohio campus in the wee hours of Oct. 12. Explicit photos of them were circulated via social media, and the woman later told police she was a victim of a sexual assault.

Investigators determined the couple, both 20-year-old students, had alcohol from a bar before the sex act, Blackburn said in a statement. Blackburn said the man asked the woman whether to stop the act when a crowd formed, and she said no.

The man has cooperated with police. The woman didn't remember what happened, and testing showed no sign of any “date rape drug,” Blackburn said.

Blackburn said the students weren't aware at the time that their act was being filmed.

“Every decision we make now has the potential to be placed on Twitter, Facebook, commented on, shared and embellished, making life today more public than ever before,” Blackburn said in the statement. “If a lesson exists from this case, let it be that we should behave as if our family is always watching.”

Ohio University President Roderick McDavis said earlier that the school, about 70 miles southeast of Columbus, would conduct its own investigation and, if appropriate, hold people accountable.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.