Chris Brown freed in D.C. after charge of assault is reduced;
WASHINGTON — Grammy Award-winning R&B singer Chris Brown was freed from custody on Monday. Earlier, he went before a judge on a charge that he punched a man who tried to pose in a photograph with him.
Prosecutors reduced a felony assault charge to a misdemeanor as a District of Columbia judge released Brown, who exited the courthouse to cheers and flashed a peace sign to supporters after more than a day and a half in custody.
Even with the reduced charge, the assault case represents the latest legal trouble for the singer, who remains on probation for assaulting his on-again, off-again girlfriend Rihanna just before the 2009 Grammy Awards.
Brown and his bodyguard, Chris Hollosy, were arrested early Sunday outside the W Hotel in Washington when police responded to reports of a fight. A 20-year-old man told police that he had tried to take a picture with Brown and two women when Brown told him, “I ain't down with that” and “I feel like boxing,” according to charging documents in the case. The man, identified by police as Parker Isaac Adams of Beltsville, Md., said he was punched by Brown and Hollosy.
Brown's lawyer, Danny Onorato, said outside court that his client had committed no crime.
“We understand that his security acted to protect Mr. Brown and Mr. Brown's property as he was authorized to do under District of Columbia law. We are confident that Mr. Brown will be exonerated of any wrongdoing,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ten Commandments monument orderered removed from Oklahoma Capitol grounds
- NSA resumes collection of phone data
- Nike’s chairman plans to step aside
- Counties defy same-sex marriage ruling
- White House intruders beware: Spikes planned
- Supreme Court to take up mandated dues for public employees unions in next term
- U.S., Cuba to announce plan to open embassies
- New York prison chief, 11 employees put on leave in escape
- Emails from Clinton’s first year as secretary of State out
- Charter lapses for Export-Import Bank; conservatives vow to block revival in House
- FDA review of OxyContin abuse-deterrent version put on hold by maker