Deficit below $1T for first time in 5 years
WASHINGTON — For the first time in five years, the government has run a budget deficit below $1 trillion.
The government said on Wednesday that the deficit for the 2013 budget year totaled $680.3 billion, down from $1.09 trillion in 2012. That's the smallest imbalance since 2008, when the government ran a $458.6 billion deficit. It's still the fifth-largest deficit of all time.
The deficit is the gap between the government's tax revenue and its spending. It narrowed for the budget year that ended on Sept. 30 because revenue rose while spending fell. Revenue jumped 13.3 percent to $2.77 trillion. Government spending declined 2.4 percent to $3.45 trillion.
A stronger economy generated more jobs and income during the past year, which generated greater tax revenue. At the same time, the Obama administration and Congress agreed in January to end a temporary cut in Social Security taxes and also to raise income taxes on the wealthy.
The Obama administration stressed in announcing the 2013 results that the government is succeeding in reducing the deficit from record levels.
“It is now less than half of what it was when the president took office,” Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said in a statement.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. Catholics at odds with church, survey finds
- Financial exec gets 8 years for fraud
- West Point law professor resigns amid remarks that critics of war on terror are ‘treasonous’
- VA enrollment data labeled unreliable
- Obama: Alaska proof of climate change dangers
- World population of trees to people: 422 to 1, team finds
- Sasquatch sighting! Maine police say Bigfoot artist nabbed
- Baltimore officers on track for trial
- Clinton: Women ‘expect’ extremism from terrorists, not GOP candidates
- Mine regulators move to expand safety feature
- 34th senator signs on to Iran nuclear deal, crumbling GOP’s hopes to override veto