In womb, babies start music appreciation class
Babies who had a lullaby played to them regularly while in the womb recognized the song months after birth, a study has found.
The researchers had 10 expectant mothers play “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star” loudly multiple times per week throughout their last trimester of pregnancy. A few days after birth, they took electroencephalogram, or EEG, recordings of each newborn's brain.
Upon hearing the lullaby again, they had significantly larger brain responses than a control group of newborns who had not been exposed to the song. The experiment was repeated after four months with similar results.
Study co-author and University of Helsinki psychologist Minna Huotilainen refers to this phenomenon as “preconscious learning.” The babies have no awareness of it — no “Oh, that old song from my intrauterine days” — but somehow their brains can pick up on the fact that they have heard it before.
“They recognize the memory, and their brains react to it,” said study co-author Eino Partanen. “But do we mean memory like how we have in adults? No. This is more like familiarity.”
The scientists found that the more times a mother played the recording for her unborn child, the stronger the electrical signal from the baby's brain would be.
When the researchers played a modified version of “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star,” the babies seemed to notice when that was amiss. The EEG was fast enough to catch note-by-note neural responses, and when a wrong note was played, their brains would react differently.
“It is a matter of noticing a difference between what you hear and what you should be hearing,” Partanen said. “Memory plays a part in that.”
The study was published online Wednesday in the journal PLOS One.
“It's plausible since late-term fetuses display the full repertoire of abilities that newborns have,” said Johns Hopkins developmental psychologist Janet DiPietro, who was not involved in the research. “They can both learn.”
Key structural parts of the ears develop throughout the first 20 weeks of gestation, and neurosensory connections going from the ears to the brain come in several weeks later.
“By the start of the third trimester, all fetuses should be able to hear,” Partanen said. “The question was, could we get the fetuses to learn something new?”
An early study on auditory fetal learning – titled “Fetal ‘Soap' Addiction” – looked at mothers who had regularly watched a certain soap opera while pregnant. Several days after birth, their babies appeared to recognize the soap's theme song whenever it came on. They would stop wailing and instead focus rapt attention toward the television.
Although many anecdotal or behavioral studies have been done, Partanen and his colleagues wanted to back up the vague speculation of fetal learning with quantitative electrical markers of the brain at work. Using electroencephalography, they aimed to capture measured neonatal brain responses directly resulting from stimuli, called event-related potentials.
Partanen suggested that expectant mothers could sing a certain song to their unborn child and that later on, if the baby is crying or stressed, singing the same melody could serve as a soothing reminder of their time in the womb.
“The voice of the mother is the most salient sound in the womb,” he said, and could heighten the effects seen in the study. It is transmitted through the bones and can drown out external sounds, rendering singing more effective than loud recorded music.
But DiPietro, who has been doing fetal research for 20 years, warned mothers not to go overboard with attempts at fetal learning.
“Just because fetuses can learn doesn't mean you need to teach them things,” she said. “The intrauterine environment has plenty of stimulation.”
Expectant mothers often ask her if they should listen to classical music while they are pregnant, thinking it could make their babies smarter or more musically inclined.
“I ask them, ‘Do you like classical music?' ‘No, not really.' So don't listen to it!” DiPietro said. “The best thing for the fetus is to keep yourself healthy.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Texas waters yield 4 bodies as death toll climbs; rainfall records fall across state
- H3N2 dog flu not cause for panic, experts say
- Legal battle over Brazilian emerald likely at end
- Thousands attend B.B. King viewing
- Cuba removed from U.S. terrorism list
- Mind was ‘falling apart,’ Colorado theater killing suspect says
- Anthrax shipments underreported
- Defense chief says U.S. can fly over South China Sea
- Ginsburg flung open doors for women
- Lawyer argues in New York court that chimpanzees have same rights as humans
- IRS believes identity thieves are from Russia