Leaders balk at Snowden's clemency plea
WASHINGTON — The White House and leaders of the intelligence committee in Congress are rejecting National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden's clemency plea.
“Mr. Snowden violated U.S. law,” White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer said on Sunday about the former systems analyst turned fugitive who has temporary asylum in Russia.
“He should return to the U.S. and face justice,” Pfeiffer said, adding when pressed that no offers for clemency were being discussed.
Snowden made the plea in a letter given to a German politician and released on Friday. In his one-page typed letter, he asks for clemency for charges of leaking classified information about the NSA to the news media. “Speaking the truth is not a crime,” Snowden wrote.
Snowden's revelations, including allegations that the United States has eavesdropped on allies including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, have led to calls to cease such spying and moves by Congress to overhaul surveillance laws and curb the agency's powers.
But the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee said if Snowden had been a true whistle-blower, he could have reported it to her committee privately. “That didn't happen, and now he's done this enormous disservice to our country,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.
The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., contended that Snowden's revelations had caused three terrorist organizations to change how they communicate.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.