Sotheby's auction rakes in $290M
NEW YORK — Impressionist and modern art achieved strong prices as Sotheby's held one of its biggest auctions ever, in a dramatic turnaround from two nights of disappointing sales at Christie's earlier this week.
Led by Giacometti's sculpture “Grande tete de Diego” and Picasso's oil “Tete de femme,” which fetched $50 million and $39.9 million respectively, the sale on Wednesday night totaled more than $290 million, with 81 percent of 64 lots finding buyers.
It was Sotheby's best Impressionist and modern art result apart from its May 2012 sale at which one of the versions of Munch's “The Scream” sold for a record $120 million. The strong sales were likely to calm market jitters that followed Christie's results, which fell far short of expectations.
As the hammer came down on the final lot, applause and whoops broke out in the salesroom. Auctioneer Tobias Meyer responded to the reaction, saying, “So the market is alive, huh?”
David Norman, Sotheby's co-chairman of Impressionist and modern art worldwide, admitted to concerns before the sale, given Christie's sales at which most of the top lots went unsold and totals fell far below even the low pre-sale estimates.
“I was concerned that the market was feeling nervous and cautious,” he said during the blockbuster sale.
Norman said pre-sale interest indicated a good showing, “but I wasn't anticipating how many bidders would be chasing the top lots.”
Indeed, collectors' deep pockets were well in evidence as more than half a dozen bidders went after Picasso's “Mousquetaire a la pipe,” a vibrant 1969 work that sold for $30,965,000, about 50 percent more than its estimate.
Monet's “Glacons, Effet blanc” attracted at least five bidders before selling for $16.1 million, including commission, and beating the high estimate.
Simon Shaw, Sotheby's New York head of Impressionist and modern art, said the results spoke for themselves, adding that when top-quality works new to the market come up and are “estimated in a responsible way, there is tremendous global demand.”
The Giacometti sculpture had never been auctioned.
Shaw said the sale had greater participation by Asian collectors than any previous Sotheby's Impressionist and modern sale.
Norman added, “This is a more global market than ever before.”
Christie's officials made the same observation this week when its top lot, a Picasso portrait of his children “Claude and Paloma” which fetched $28.2 million, was bought by Chinese mogul Wang Jianlin on behalf of the Dalian Wanda Group conglomerate.
On Tuesday, Giacometti's “Diego en chemise ecossaise” sold for $32.6 million, a record for a painting by the artist, and several of the top lots went to Asian clients.
Andreas Rumbler, acting head of Impressionist and modern art who was also Christie's auctioneer, said, “I witnessed significant international participation, with particularly fervent bidding from our Asian colleagues working with clients from several different countries in the region.”
For its part, Sotheby's said its sale on Wednesday was marked by “record levels of participation from both Asia and Latin America.”
The auctions continue next week when Christie's and Sotheby's hold their sales of postwar and contemporary art.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama vetoes union election bill; streamlined election process to move forward
- Report: Wind could supply a third of the country’s power by 2050
- Despite high gas costs, Northeast resistant to pipelines
- Mining for tourists? A dubious economic savior in Appalachia
- FBI agent, 2 others sentenced in contractor kickback scheme in Utah
- Indiana governor wants changes to religious-objection law
- Former Massey Energy CEO pleads not guilty again in W.Va. mine safety case
- Gun used by agent who helped jail Capone headed to museum
- Mysteries of dark matter come to light in Science study
- Experts skeptical of N.D.’s new oil train safety checks
- Benghazi panel formally requests private interview with Hillary