Yosemite sequoia grove to receive $24M restoration
YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK, Calif. — Yosemite National Park officials are moving forward on a $24 million plan to remove parking lots, roads and buildings from Mariposa Grove, an ancient collection of humongous sequoias.
The National Park Service could start work on removing asphalt and a gift shop from the grove in southern Yosemite as early as next summer. The restoration plan, expected to be finalized in December, is meant to help the old trees survive and thrive for future generations of park visitors.
Yosemite botanist Lisa Acree said the trees' ability to reproduce is harmed by the prevalence of asphalt beneath their boughs.
“The trees send out thousands of seeds each year, but a lot of them land on asphalt,” Acree told The Fresno Bee.
Parking and traffic would be moved two miles away to the park's South Entrance at Highway 41. During peak visiting times, a shuttle bus will ferry people to the grove.
The plan is to install boardwalks over sensitive areas, so as not to disturb the ecosystem.
An estimated $20 million is expected to be raised by the Yosemite Conservancy, with the remaining $4 million coming from federal funds.
Mariposa Grove is an important piece of Yosemite's history: It was included in the Yosemite Land Grant signed by President Abraham Lincoln on June 30, 1864.
It is one of the world's 65 remaining natural sequoia groves.
“This is such a beautiful and important place,” Yosemite spokesman Scott Gediman said. “The restoration project will protect it for future generations.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Football game in St. Louis halted by gunshots
- Survivor: Oregon college gunman spared 1 to give police a message
- W.Va. native killed as C-130 transport plane crashes in Afghanistan
- Secret Service Director Clancy revises account of Chaffetz job bid info
- Oregon college gunman’s victims walked varied paths
- Apartment blast kills 1 in Brooklyn
- Shell backtracks on Arctic oil drilling
- Oregon shooter a lonely youth with grudge against religion
- Navy intelligence official indicted on charges of theft, conspiracy
- California vineyards skip irrigation amid drought