Share This Page

Family visits site of Rutgers student's suicide

| Sunday, Nov. 10, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

FORT LEE, N.J. — The family of a Rutgers University student whose suicide sparked a national conversation about the treatment of young gay people paid a first visit on Sunday to the bridge where he took his life.

Members of Tyler Clementi's family crossed the George Washington Bridge to New York City to help raise awareness about the dangers of bullying.

Clementi's mother, Jane, and brother, James, linked arms and walked with Ronnie Kroell and Elliot Dal Pra London, co-founders of The Friend Movement, who had walked from Chicago to New Jersey in Tyler's memory as part of a bullying awareness campaign. More than 50 others joined them.

The 18-year-old Rutgers freshman jumped to his death in 2010 upon finding out his roommate had used a webcam to spy on him kissing a man in their dorm room.

Clementi's roommate, Dharun Ravi, spent 20 days in jail after being convicted of bias intimidation, invasion of privacy and witness tampering. He is appealing.

Clementi's mother told The Star-Ledger of Newark that Sunday's visit to the scene of her son's death was a painful one.

“Obviously, it's a symbol of great sadness for me and my family, but it is also a symbol that we can have hope,” Jane Clementi said. “Just looking around and seeing all the support we have, that's what everyone has. Everyone has that support. We have to just look to that and reach out to that.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.