Man, 93, buries his dog's grisly discovery
SEATTLE — A 93-year-old Washington state man, whose dog returned home with a human leg it had found, buried it in his back yard on an Indian reservation to avoid being suspected of a crime, a local official and media reports said.
The dog found the unknown person's leg last week on the Nisqually Reservation, about 60 miles south of Seattle, Thurston County Sheriff's Office spokesman Tim Rudloff said late on Monday evening.
Bill Flowers picked up the leg brought home by his dog, Liberty, and thought of calling the police, he told KOMO-TV during the weekend. But fearing they would suspect him of foul play, he buried it in his backyard, where it remained for several days until he told his daughter, who urged him to call the police.
“I was afraid to call. I'm 93 years old. I didn't want to have to go to the pen for something I didn't do,” Flowers told the television station.
Officials and volunteers working with search dogs found a rib cage, a pelvis and part of a skull, including a jawbone with teeth, as they combed the area on Sunday, Rubloff said, adding that authorities were working to identify the remains.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology
- Paul edges Walker in CPAC straw poll
- Buffet: Berkshire’s built to last
- More Indian tribes rethink idea of legalized marijuana on reservations
- Perceived slights have some New Yorkers longing for Pennsylvania
- Gene making human brains bigger found
- Florida fisherman’s high court win spurs call for legal reform
- Monarch butterflies find milkweed supply dwindles
- Most young Republicans back legal marijuana
- Foreign government gifts to family charity present candidacy hurdle for Hillary Clinton