Female senators unite to fight sexual assault
WASHINGTON — One by one, the women of the Senate stood up, speaking out about the scourge of sexual assault in the military and their collaborative effort to address the long-neglected issue.
New Hampshire Republican Sen. Kelly Ayotte, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee in her first term, said on Tuesday it was an issue “that the women of the Senate have really, I think, driven,” not necessarily a woman's issue, but one of justice and fairness.
With several female colleagues listening, four-term Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., hailed the record 20 women in the 100-member Senate but insisted that history should not be limited to numbers.
“Instead, it is what we do with our newfound strength to address the issues that are impacting women across the country,” said Murray, the head of the Senate Budget Committee.
In speech after speech on the Senate floor, Republican and Democratic women — 10 of the 20 — focused on their unity in trying to force Congress to embrace sweeping changes to the decades-old military justice system as part of the annual Defense policy bill.
They put aside their bitter differences over how to prosecute the alleged attackers, concentrating on the common ground of how to end the epidemic of sexual assault. The Pentagon estimates that 26,000 members of the military potentially were sexually assaulted last year, though thousands were afraid to come forward.
Under the Defense bill, commanders would be stripped of their ability to overturn jury convictions, any individual convicted of sexual assault would face a dishonorable discharge or dismissal, and a civilian review would be triggered when a decision is made not to prosecute a case.
The bill would provide a special counsel for victims and eliminate the statute of limitations for courts-martial.
Senate action on the bill is the culmination of months of work, largely led by the seven women who serve on the 26-member Armed Services Committee — a high-water mark for a panel that for decades was a male bastion.
“This is what the American people wanted, us working together,” said five-term said Maryland Democratic Sen. Barbara Mikulski, the head of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said the senators were united by the need for serious reforms. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., spoke of the importance of addressing the crimes. Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Washington state's Maria Cantwell and the newest members, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, delivered forceful speeches.
In a fractious Congress, the women have persuaded their colleagues to support the changes in a rare instance of bipartisanship. The women represented various stages of Senate experience, but all have displayed some willingness to compromise on certain issues.
On issues that divide them, they are lobbying hard.
New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, chairwoman of the Armed Services personnel subcommittee, wants to give victims of rape and sexual assault in the military an independent route outside the chain of command for prosecuting attackers.
Her solution would take the decision from commanders and give it to seasoned military lawyers. The top echelon of the military has opposed her plan, and she has faced resistance from a number of Democrats and Republicans, including the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Firefights tax Forest Service budget
- Percentage of vets hired for federal jobs hits 5-year high
- Warrant required to track cellphones, Justice Department’s new policy states
- Many millennials see themselves as self-absorbed, wasteful
- Pair of dust clouds shrouds storm-battered Phoenix
- Kentucky county clerk Davis jailed for stand on same-sex marriage licenses
- Trio to serve time in rock attack off interstate
- Former firefighter guilty of estranged wife’s murder
- Former Corinthian College students seek relief
- Clinton aides pressed former State worker Pagliano to testify on use of email
- Railroads get 6-month pass on leaky cars