Vehicle crash, false report of gunman cause panic at LAX
LOS ANGELES — A car crash and false alarms on Friday night evacuated Los Angeles International Airport terminals, stalled dozens of flights and panicked passengers.
About 4,600 passengers were affected by the disruptions during one of the airport's busiest holiday seasons, officials said.
The panic started when a woman driving on the airport's arrivals loop had a medical emergency and lost control of her SUV. The vehicle hit a woman who was walking on a sidewalk before it slammed into a parking garage across the roadway from Terminal 5, said Los Angeles police Sgt. Mark Guardado.
Sounds from the crash spurred reports of gunfire among passengers inside the terminal. Many fled the building, said airport police Chief Patrick Gannon.
“It was determined relatively quickly that there was not a shooting,” he said.
Both women in the crash were injured, the pedestrian seriously, Guardado told KTTV-TV. Details on the women's conditions were not immediately available Saturday morning.
In neighboring Terminal 4, airport police received an anonymous call just after the crash reporting a gunman at a specific gate, Gannon said.
The call prompted police to evacuate about 2,000 people from both terminals while they investigated. No gunman was found, and passengers were allowed to return but had to be rescreened by security.
“It took us a couple of hours to clear those terminals,” Gannon said. “It created quite a disturbance.”
The caller had not been identified as of Saturday.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Police code of conduct aims to curb unlawful seizures from motorists
- Letter that inspired Beat poet Kerouac discovered
- Ohio dairy farmers cashing in on gas well boom
- Boy with fake gun shot by officer dies
- Nevada speaker-elect steps down amid criticism
- Graham rejects GOP Benghazi report as ‘garbage’
- 32 horses killed in stable fire near Chicago
- Report: College judicial boards work secretively
- E-cigarettes cut cravings, study finds
- Tension, anxiety mount in Ferguson as grand jury ruling awaited
- Even before Ebola contained, U.S. looks to next health crisis