Galaxy hunters vie in distance contest
By USA Today
Published: Saturday, Nov. 23, 2013, 7:27 p.m.
Let others pursue the fattest grouse or the most gigantic buck. A new breed of 21st-century hunters is on the chase, their weapon the most advanced telescopes, their prey bigger than the solar system.
For the past few years, scientists have engaged in a fierce competition to bag the most distant galaxies in the cosmos —galaxies that existed less than a billion years after the Big Bang, the colossal explosion that founded the universe. Records have been set, broken and broken again, while astrophysicists joust over which early galaxies are real and which are embarrassing errors.
The contest is more than a “fast and furious race,” as one scientific paper called it. The quest for the farthest galaxies has shed light on the evolution of the young universe, but now researchers hope to pinpoint the onset of “cosmic dawn,” when starlight from newborn galaxies first bathed the universe.
Snaring a distant galaxy is a lot harder than bagging the most elusive game. The farthest galaxies are, to human eyes, “literally invisible,” says University of Texas-Austin astrophysicist Steven Finkelstein, whose team holds one distance record. He explains that when light from far-off galaxies travels to telescopes in our neck of the cosmic woods, any visible light is transformed along the way into a light “redder than our eyes can see,” though it's visible to the right kind of cameras and telescopes.
Such “redshifted” light spends billions of years journeying to the vicinity of Earth. The information encoded in the light gives scientists a picture of galaxies as they were billions of years ago — essentially the baby pictures of the universe. The farther away the galaxy, the further back in time we see.
For years, scientists could peer back no further than about 12 billion years ago, when the universe was about 780 million years old. Finally, in 2009, astronauts fitted the Hubble Space Telescope with a new camera, called Wide Field Camera 3, that revolutionized the galaxy-hunting business. Wide Field 3 is far more efficient than its predecessor on the Hubble, and it can see very red light, just the right color for detecting the most distant galaxies.
Researchers have discovered about 200 galaxies that were in existence less than 780 million years after the Big Bang, according to research by astrophysicist Garth Illingworth of the University of California-Santa Cruz and his colleagues.
Though there's still much to learn, Hubble can't help much more. Researchers are waiting eagerly for the opening of an array of ground-based telescopes and for the 2018 launch of NASA's James Webb Space Telescope, which should allow researchers to detect galaxies not long after the Big Bang.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Gillibrand sex assault bill halted by fellow Democrat
- Shuster plans oversight for DUI program
- Tenn. homicide suspect shot mom in 2004
- ‘Senior officers should not do that,’ Army leader says in pleading guilty to misconduct charges
- Former National Security Agency contractor Snowden’s leaks to cost billions, take years to fix
- Health marketplace targets not signing up, survey shows
- Sex-crimes prosecutor accused in groping
- Crisis stymies Obama getaway
- Lawmakers vote to bar ‘upskirt’ photos in Massachusetts
- ‘Drug czar’ cleared to lead Border Patrol