Obama responds to heckler on immigration reform: 'It won't be as easy as shouting'
SAN FRANCISCO — A young man's plea was direct: Stop the deportations, he urged President Obama, of the 11.5 million undocumented immigrants in the United States.
“You have the power to stop deportations for all,” the man said as he interrupted Obama's immigration policy speech here on Monday afternoon.
“Actually,” the president replied, “I don't. And that's why we're here.”
He added, “The easy way out is to try to yell and pretend like I can do something by violating our laws. And what I'm proposing is the harder path, which is to use our democratic processes to achieve the same goal that you want to achieve — but it won't be as easy as just shouting. It requires us lobbying and getting it done.”
Surprise hecklers have become a staple of Obama's public events, but it's rare that one underscores the message that the president is trying to deliver.
Obama traveled to San Francisco's Chinatown on Monday to argue that immigration reform would be an economic windfall for the Bay Area and other communities nationwide.
Obama urged House Republicans to take up the Senate's compromise immigration bill. He reiterated his support for a piecemeal approach in the House if that's what it would take to pass a package of reforms.
Brendan Buck, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said, “The speaker is sincere in wanting to get something done, and we're pleased the president said he can accept the step-by-step approach we're taking in the House.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama avoids calling terrorist attacks ‘Islamice_SSRq
- Day, night 4-digit drawings match
- Mideast-North Africa category considered for 2020 Census
- Executive order directs standards to reflect climate change projections
- Teen girl Hernandez killed by Denver police once cited for resisting arrest
- Tickets let players bring home bacon — scent
- Judge orders nonprofit tax form release in case against IRS
- Alpha to idle two West Virginia coal mines
- Treasure hunter accused of swindling investors captured
- Penn State University eyes changes to sexual misconduct case handling
- Company with W.Va. chemical spill ties cited 8 times