TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Post-hospital care costs studied amid Medicare discrepancies

Daily Photo Galleries

By Kaiser Health News
Thursday, Nov. 28, 2013, 8:21 p.m.
 

After years of trying to clamp down on hospital spending, the federal government wants to get control over what Medicare spends on nursing homes, home health services and other medical care typically provided to patients when they leave a hospital.

Researchers have discovered huge discrepancies in how much is spent on these services in different areas nationwide. Medicare spends $8,800 on each Louisiana patient receiving home health care, $5,000 more than it spends on the average New Jersey senior. In Chicago, one in four Medicare beneficiaries receives additional services after leaving the hospital — three times the rate in Phoenix. In Connecticut, Medicare beneficiaries are more than twice as likely to end up in a nursing home as they are in Arizona.

Medicare per capita spending on these services, collectively known as post-acute or post-hospital care, has grown 5 percent a year or faster in 34 of the nation's 50 most populous hospital markets in recent years, according to an analysis that health care economist Chapin White conducted for Kaiser Health News.

Last year, $62 billion — $1 in every $6 Medicare spent in the traditional fee-for-service program — went to nursing and therapy for patients in rehabilitation facilities, nursing homes, long-term care hospitals and in their own homes, according to a congressional advisory panel.

Most of them received those services after leaving the hospital. Some of these providers earn double-digit profits from Medicare through payment methods that health experts say encourage unnecessary and disjointed care, waste taxpayer money and make fraud easier. More than a quarter of Medicare spending in Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Texas was for post-acute care in 2011, Medicare records show.

Hospitals often are the gatekeepers to this world. But analysts say they do not consider costs — or sometimes patients' best interests — when discharging patients.

“They have not had to think remotely about costs or quality or anything except where's a bed available,” said Anne Tumlinson, a consultant at Avalere Health in Washington. “Often doctors have very little to do with the discharge decision. Largely, it has to do with the supply of providers and type of providers in the area.”

Now, Medicare is experimenting with new payment methods in which hospitals and post-acute providers would be given a lump sum to take care of a patient, forcing them to become more efficient if they want to make money.

In addition, President Obama has proposed reducing payments for some conditions to post-acute providers and beginning to pay the same rates for similar patients.

Stephen Parente, a health care economist at the University of Minnesota, said the changes are likely to upend much of the industry. “It's going to be a fairly ugly transition to get to a more efficient, streamlined system,” he said. “It's going to be a consultant's bonanza.”

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Man caught jumping White House fence
  2. Judge orders W.Va. agency to release pollution data
  3. Alleged trooper killer may have been seen Friday
  4. West Virginia University warns students over riots
  5. Security at Capitol questioned
  6. 8 arrested in post-game riots in Morgantown
  7. Academic scandal at University of North Carolina bigger than previously reported
  8. Chinese hackers busy, FBI warns
  9. Immigration work permits could rise under contract
  10. Coburn’s final ‘Wastebook’ tallies $25B in what he considers ‘pork’
  11. Coast Guard to seek billions to protect Arctic interests
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.