New York's Cardinal Dolan says Roman Catholic Church 'outmarketed' on gay marriage
By The Associated Press
Published: Saturday, Nov. 30, 2013, 5:57 p.m.
NEW YORK — New York's Cardinal Timothy Dolan says the Roman Catholic Church has been “outmarketed” on the issue of gay marriage and has been “caricatured as being anti-gay.”
Dolan discussed the church's positions opposing same-sex marriage and abortion in an interview with “Meet the Press” moderator David Gregory that will air on Sunday on NBC.
Gregory noted that Illinois just became the latest state to legalize gay marriage and asked, “Regardless of the church teachings, do you think this is evolving in such a way that it's ultimately going to be legal everywhere?”
Or, he asked, will there be “a backlash” against gay marriage?
“I think I'd be a Polly-anna to say that there doesn't seem to be kind of a stampede to do this,” Dolan said. “I regret that.”
Asked why the church is losing the argument on gay marriage, Dolan responded, “Well, I think maybe we've been outmarketed sometimes. We've been caricatured as being anti-gay.”
He said the church supports “traditional marriage and is not “anti-anybody,” adding, “When you have forces like Hollywood, when you have forces like politicians, when you have forces like some opinion-molders that are behind it, it's a tough battle.”
But he said the church will not give up on the gay marriage issue.
On another divisive issue, Dolan said the Catholic Church has long championed comprehensive health care, but he said American Catholic bishops cannot support the Affordable Care Act as long as it includes coverage for abortion.
The cardinal said the bishops started “bristling” at the legislation pushed by President Obama because “it's excluding the undocumented immigrant and it's excluding the unborn baby.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Floodwaters fall in Montana, Wyoming
- FDA approves migraine treatment device
- CIA accused of meddling in torture probe
- Mo. man freedin editor’sdeath sues for $100M
- Attack cat to receive medical treatment, therapy
- General gets OK to pursue plea deal
- Wiretaps to be included in Blagojevich appeal
- Nominee to head NSA leery of delays inherent in 3rd-party collection of telephone data
- Lerner emails looked for way out of difficulties at the IRS
- Senate plan aims to overhaul Fannie, Freddie
- Documents show guilty D.C. businessman gave $600K for Hillary canvassers