Promised repairs on federal health care website to be tested
The rollout of President Obama's health care law entered a critical phase on Saturday, the deadline for substantially fixing the program's troubled enrollment website, as the administration scrambled to address the most obvious glitches.
The White House, under pressure by both Republican opponents and some members of Obama's Democratic Party, promised five weeks ago that by Nov. 30 it would repair HealthCare.gov. The site was designed to help people sign up for medical coverage but has been plagued by errors, outages and slow speeds since its Oct. 1 start.
Basic account creation and log-in functions appeared to work smoothly on Saturday, but groups helping the sign-up effort described other errors in the process.
The site's ability to handle target traffic loads of 50,000 users or more at the same time will be tested in the coming days. A website shutdown to accommodate fixes was set for early Sunday.
Health insurance companies, whose plans in 36 states are featured on HealthCare.gov, said significant problems remain, particularly in the “back end” where enrollment is confirmed and payment is made.
“Until the enrollment process is working from end-to-end, many consumers will not be able to enroll in coverage,” said Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health Insurance Plans, a lobby group.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the agency responsible for the website, said it was performing well on Saturday “despite heavier than usual weekend traffic,” although it did not release any data.
Jeffrey Zients, the Obama aide tasked with leading the rescue mission, was to brief reporters on the site's progress at 9 a.m. Sunday.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Yellowstone bison could be culled by 900
- Snowden: U.S. shared info about Americans
- Holder urges bigger reward for whistle-blowers
- House panel OKs move to split Amtrak, focus on profitable Northeast Corridor
- VA report sugarcoats actions, doctor says
- FBI, federal marshals join manhunt for survivalist accused of ambushing troopers
- Red tide threatens Florida economy