United Auto Workers considers first dues hike since 1967
DETROIT — The United Auto Workers is considering increasing membership dues by 25 percent, the first increase since 1967, as its membership dwindles and costs rise, a top UAW official and several union sources said.
The UAW, the richest American union with $1 billion in assets, is one of the most politically influential, contributing to the campaigns of Democratic politicians from the state level to presidential candidates. However, the union's influence and finances have waned as membership has fallen 30 percent since 2005 to 382,500 members — a far cry from its peak of about 1.5 million members in 1979.
UAW leaders are considering increasing dues to the equivalent of 2.5 hours per month, up from two hours per month for hourly workers in the automotive industry as well as governmental, nursing, academic and other fields represented by the union, several people familiar with the discussions said.
A veteran UAW-represented worker at General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., or Fiat's U.S. unit Chrysler making $28.125 per hour pays union dues of $56.25 per month. That would rise to $70.32 per month. A recently hired worker making $15.78 per hour could experience a rise to $39.45 per month from $31.56.
Jimmy Settles, UAW vice president and the top union official for workers at Ford, emphasized that the increase in dues is “only in the discussion phase. No decision has been made.”
Settles said it was not clear whether the possible dues increase would be decided by the UAW's leadership or by a vote of members, perhaps at the union's convention in June.
The dues discussion arises as the union tries to organize workers at foreign-owned automotive plants, including the Volkswagen AG plant in Chattanooga, Tenn.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Arizona county clears girl shooter in gun range death
- Death Valley ‘sailing rocks’ linked to freeze-warm cycle
- GMOs: Science and skepticism
- Study examines body’s bacteria on move indoors
- Judge reaffirms Texas’ ‘Robin Hood’ system of school funding unconstitutional
- Prison term for Detroit porch gunman debated
- Southern Calif. high surf expected to subside today
- U.S. waffling on ISIS feeds confusion among possible allies
- Ferguson sued over police actions amid riots
- Obama rules out military response
- Military pilot was killed in Va. crash