Lawmakers' plan would point cameras at train engineers
NEW YORK — A week after four people died in a New York commuter train derailment, two federal lawmakers proposed on Sunday that trains nationwide be outfitted with cameras pointed at engineers and at the tracks.
“I know you're going to hear from Metro-North that there are costs, but the costs of these audio and visual recorders is minuscule, in fact negligible, compared to the hundreds of millions of dollars that this tragic incident will cost Metro-North in the end,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., who joined Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., for a news conference in Manhattan's Grand Central Terminal.
On Dec. 1, a Metro-North Railroad train approached a curve on the tracks just north of Manhattan going at 82 mph instead of the speed limit of 30 mph. Rail cars careened off the tracks, with the front car ending up inches from the water where the Hudson River meets the Harlem River.
A lawyer and union leader for the derailed train's engineer, William Rockefeller, have said the train's hypnotic motion may have caused him to experience a “nod” or a “daze” at the controls.
The Democratic lawmakers are urging the Federal Railroad Administration to demand the implementation of a measure they say might prevent the kind of deadly Metro-North derailment that left dozens of people injured.
The National Transportation Safety Board recommended installation of recording cameras in locomotives and operating railway cabs five years ago.
The NTSB did not respond to a call on Sunday, nor did the railroad administration or the Metropolitan Transportation Authority that runs Metro-North.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pair of NYC officers killed in ambush shooting
- Financial fraudster used investors’ lucre to freeze dead wife, feds contend
- Document hunt to begin for illegals who need proof of residency since 2010 for permit, reprieve
- N.Y. reports crime decrease, credits ‘broken windows’
- Teenager who attacked California Highway Patrol officer with machete shot, killed
- 4 Afghans freed from Guantanamo
- Cat saved from California storm drain after 2 weeks
- Ghostly snailfish found at record depth
- Gray wolf decision reversed
- 2014 death sentences, executions plummet
- FBI’s 2001 anthrax attack investigation questioned