44,000 Cuban migrants arrive in U.S. in fiscal year '13
MIAMI — In mid-July, a public health clinic in Miami had such a sharp increase in Cuban migrants walking in for required health screenings that it had to expand its hours of operation.
The number of Cubans going to the Florida State Department of Health clinic surged by 20 percent in June, compared to the three-year average for the month, and experts in South Florida noted similar increases in arrivals.
By the end of August, the clinic had returned to its regular hours.
Cuban migrant arrivals in South Florida have subsided. But at least 44,000 arrived in the United States in fiscal year 2013, which ended Sept. 30. It was the highest total since 1994 and 10 percent higher than the estimated 40,000 arrivals in fiscal year 2012.
Several factors contributed to the increase: More U.S. visas issued to Cubans; rumors that U.S. benefits for Cuban migrants might be cut; Spain's economic crisis; Cuba's easing of its migration rules on Jan. 14; and a crackdown on Cubans living in Ecuador.
The U.S. diplomatic mission in Havana issued 24,727 immigrant visas in fiscal year 2013, a slight drop from the 26,720 in the previous year, according to government figures. Washington promised to issue at least 20,000 migrant visas a year to Cubans after the 1994 “Rafter Crisis,” during which 35,000 migrants took to homemade boats, to discourage such risky voyages.
The number of tourist visas issued in the same periods more than doubled, from 14,362 to 29,927, the figures showed.
Officials say that on average, 20 percent of tourist visa recipients remained to live in the United States in recent years, suggesting that about 6,000 of the 29,927 visitors will become migrants.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.