Embassy bombings trial might use 2 juries, judge says
NEW YORK — A federal judge said on Thursday that he might use two juries at an embassy bombings trial next year so evidence against one defendant won't taint jurors hearing the case against the others.
U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kap-lan raised the possibility during a pretrial conference for two defendants extradited from Great Britain and a third snatched off the streets of Tripoli, Libya, in October and brought to New York to face charges in the 1998 bombings at U.S. embassies in Africa that killed 224 people, including a dozen Americans.
At the hearing, Kaplan rejected defense requests that he separate the trial of Abu Anas al-Libi from a trial for Adel Abdel Bary and Khaled al-Fawwaz, who were extradited from Britain last year.
As he set a Nov. 3 trial date, Kaplan said two juries would allow him to send one jury out of the room if evidence was going to be introduced that might jeopardize the fairness of the trial to other defendants.
Bernard Kleinman, an attorney for al-Libi, had told the judge in a letter that he objected to the government's request for a joint trial. He said his client was only accused of participating in visual and photographic surveillance of the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya, in late 1993 and researching potential sites for other attacks with members of al-Qaida in 1994.
He said the government case against the others claimed activity over a long period of time leading up to and including the August 1998 bombings of embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.
With a single trial, “in the hearts and minds of the jury, he will be lumped together with his co-defendants,” Kleinman wrote.
He added: “This case involves issues much more tinged with emotion and trauma than other cases. The fact that Mr. al-Libi will be tried in New York, barely a half mile from the World Trade Center site, and that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida will be referenced numerous times in connection with his co-defendants cannot be ignored.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Defense chief says U.S. can fly over South China Sea
- Growth potential remains for online gambling
- Worries mount of unleashed ‘Taliban 5’
- Morgan settles lawsuit with Wal-Mart over crash
- Nebraska lawmakers ban death penalty
- IRS believes identity thieves are from Russia
- Charged Baltimore officers seek change of venue
- Fossils point to relative of ‘Lucy’ species
- Lawyer argues in New York court that chimpanzees have same rights as humans
- Navy divers to salvage remains of Confederate warship in Georgia
- Administration finalizes, defends broader regulations under Clean Water Act