Vegas home seller willing to accept bitcoins
LAS VEGAS — A casino owner-turned-commercial developer is asking for $7.85 million to sell a Las Vegas home, and he's willing to accept the online currency bitcoin for the deal.
Jack Sommer said he got the idea to seek bitcoin for his 25,000-square-foot mansion from two of his sons, who have been involved in making and trading the currency.
“The advantage is that we're expanding our market and adding some notoriety,” Sommer said.
Bitcoin peer-to-peer trading began in 2009. Value is purchased through an exchange website with a mainstream paper currency, such as dollars or euros, though trading is not government-regulated.
Using the currency can streamline international business deals, said Julian Tosh, a consultant and owner of the marketplace website bitcoinsinvegas.com.
“There are a bunch of people who have bitcoins, and they're dying for a place to spend it,” Tosh told the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
He said Sommer's willingness to accept bitcoin could open the home to a global audience.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ariz. inmate’s execution apparently botched
- Obamacare enrollees strain Medicaid in Oregon
- Man told transit police the Boston Marathon bomber ‘was my best friend’
- Head of troubled CDC anthrax lab quits
- Arkansas Air Force base lockdown ends with no ‘credible’ threat
- Massachusetts teen held in teacher’s slaying accused assaulting detention center worker
- Mountaineer workers fear smoking ban will harm ‘livelihood’
- U.S. knew Islamist militants planned offensive in Iraq, lawmakers told
- Fire season expected to accelerate
- Sketch of suspect released in peacock’s shooting death in Calif.
- Mont. senator’s thesis appears to have been plagarized