TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Safety backup present on all Metro-North trains in New York City

REUTERS
New York Police Department officials use a boat to search the water around the site of a Metro-North train derailment on Sunday, Dec. 1, 2013, in the Bronx borough of New York City.

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Associated Press
Sunday, Dec. 15, 2013, 7:27 p.m.
 

NEW YORK — After a speeding Metro-North Railroad commuter train barreled into a curve and derailed in New York City on Dec. 1, safety advocates said similar deadly accidents might soon be avoided. Railroads across the country are preparing to deploy high-tech control systems that will let computers automatically slow trains that are moving too fast or headed for a collision.

Yet there is low-tech equipment, widely available since the Great Depression, that could have prevented the crash, and every Metro-North train has it.

For many years, the trains have been outfitted with control systems that will sound an alarm if an engineer exceeds a designated speed or blows through a red light, then robotically slam on the brakes if the driver doesn't respond.

Historically, though, the system has been used on Metro-North mainly to keep trains from colliding, not to enforce speed limits on curves, hills or bridges.

That meant that no alarm sounded when engineer William Rockefeller failed to slow as he approached a tight curve in the Bronx. Federal investigators said the train was moving at 82 mph, well above the curve's 30 mph speed limit. Four people died in the wreck. Rockefeller said he became dazed or nodded at the controls, according to federal investigators, his lawyer and a union official.

A week after the derailment, Metro-North adjusted its signaling system so trains approaching the bend too fast will trigger the alarm and automatic braking system.

Similar upgrades are planned during the next few months to enforce speed limits at eight other curves and bridges in Metro-North's 384-mile system.

The relatively quick fix for the deadly section of track raises a question: Why wasn't it done sooner?

The simplest answer seems to be that on most rail systems, engineers have been seen as capable of handling routine speed adjustments on curves and bridges without mechanical backup.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Nurse who survived Ebola virus says Dallas hospital failed her
  2. Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
  3. Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
  4. 2 W.Va. coal operators sentenced in scheme
  5. Cold, snow break February records in Northeast
  6. Dead dog found in pickup truck in icy river
  7. Deadly bacteria release spurs concern at Louisiana lab
  8. GOP senators pledge help if court bars health care law subsidies
  9. Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology
  10. No signs of deal on Homeland funding
  11. Astronauts complete extensive cable job in spacewalks