Medical journal: 'Case closed' against vitamin pills
The latest studies on vitamins have some medical experts saying “case closed” — it's time for most consumers to stop wasting money on multivitamins and other supplements, because they have no proven benefits and some possible harms.
That declaration was made in a strongly worded editorial that accompanies two studies and an expert panel's report published on Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
“The message is simple: Most supplements do not prevent chronic disease or death, their use is not justified and they should be avoided,” says the editorial, signed by two researchers from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, one British researcher and one of the journal's senior editors. After years of study and mostly disappointing results, the editorial says, “enough is enough.”
“What we've found time and again is that the supplements are not working … we don't need to go on studying them forever,” said editorial writer Eliseo Guallar of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Among those begging to differ are a vitamin industry group and one of the researchers whose studies prompted the editorial.
“While those in the ivory tower may say that people just need to eat their sardines and salads, in the real world there are nutrient gaps,” said Duffy MacKay of the Council for Responsible Nutrition, which represents supplement makers.
Research gaps remain too, said John Michael Gaziano, a researcher at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the VA Boston Healthcare System. He co-authored one of the studies. “It drives me crazy that they say ‘enough is enough,' when there's only been one large study of (standard) multivitamins and it's ours,” he said.
The results from that study will disappoint anyone who hoped a multivitamin might keep them sharp in old age. The study followed male physicians older than 65 for an average of 11 years and found multivitamins had no effect on cognitive decline. But previous results, published one year ago, suggested taking multivitamins led to an 8 percent decline in cancer risk in men older than 50. Additional results suggested multivitamins might lower the risk of cataracts.
Those findings of possible benefits are not definitive, but “I'd say the case is not closed,” Gaziano said.
A second, unrelated study in Annals found high-dose multivitamins had no effect on the progression of heart disease in heart attack survivors. The journal contains a previously released report from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. That report says “limited evidence supports any benefit from vitamin and mineral supplementation for the prevention of cancer or cardiovascular disease.” It calls the possible effect on cancer in men “border-line significant.” And it notes that some studies have found harm, particularly in the case of beta-carotene supplements, which increase lung cancer risks in smokers.
But studies have found no harm in standard multivitamins, and there's no evidence that taking vitamins causes people to eat worse or otherwise neglect their health, MacKay said.
One likely harm, Guallar said, is that most of the 53 percent of American consumers who use supplements are wasting money, to the tune of $28 billion a year. He said research money is being wasted, too.
But he said there are exceptions. For example, health officials strongly urge women of childbearing age to take folic acid, to prevent birth defects. Some ongoing studies of vitamin D, he said, are justified because some benefits, such as preventing falls in the elderly, appear possible.
The decision about whether to take vitamins is personal. Physician Robert Wachter, an expert in patient safety at the University of California, San Francisco, said he agrees that most people who take supplements “are throwing money down the drain.”
He adds that he takes a daily multivitamin. That's because he is 56, is from a family with a “huge amount of cancer” and finds the evidence of a possible protective effect for men like him compelling enough, he said.
But “there are other things that are of far greater benefit,” he said, including not smoking, eating well and getting adequate exercise.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- People who knew Virginia TV station shooter Flanagan recall his quick temper
- Clinton: Women ‘expect’ extremism from terrorists, not GOP candidates
- Compatibility of 1st-responder radios in doubt
- 13 states spared EPA regulation of waterways
- Obama marks Hurricane Katrina anniversary in New Orleans visit
- Obama opens climate change tour
- Virginia reporter, cameraman killed on air; gunman also dies
- Planned Parenthood alleges ‘smear’ campaign in letter to top lawmakers
- Ex-crime lab chief: Illegal’s fatal shot in San Francisco likely accidental
- Bison gores worker on California’s Catalina Island
- Hawaii coral reefs under observation as dangerous bleaching expected again soon