Phoenix 1st city to end veterans' chronic homelessness
By The Washington Post
Published: Friday, Dec. 20, 2013, 7:42 p.m.
Phoenix says it eradicated chronic veteran homelessness on Wednesday.
Three years ago a state coalition aimed at ending chronic homelessness among veterans identified 222 living in Phoenix. As of early November, 56 remained, but a $100,000 allocation of funds enabled the city to house them all as of mid-week, winning what the mayor's office described as a friendly competition with Utah's Salt Lake City to become the first U.S. city to do so.
“Phoenix can take its place as role model city for gratitude and care towards veterans,” Mayor Greg Stanton said in a release.
Phoenix's push was part of a broader national campaign. President Obama has pushed to end chronic homelessness among veterans by 2015, a goal that officials say they are on their way to achieving.
“We are on the right track in the fight to end homelessness among veterans,” Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki said in a late-November statement.
Since 2010, veteran homelessness has declined by 24 percent nationally, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs. But a single-night count from January suggests that there are still somewhere around 57,849 homeless veterans nationwide. Just under 8 percent were women.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development and the VA have awarded millions of dollars in grants to local groups helping to further the cause. In July, for example, the VA announced that it had awarded nearly $300 million to more than 300 community agencies to help homeless or at-risk veterans and their families.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Expats renounce citizenship over U.S. tax hassles
- D.C. mayor denies he knew of illegal ‘shadow campaign’
- Toomey instrumental in derailing Justice nominee
- Elephants attuned to human voices
- Changes to Medicare drug coverage scrapped
- Poll: Uninsured rate drops, but Hispanics lag in sign-ups
- Deaths from heroin, pain pills called ‘urgent,’ growing’ crisis
- Snowden captivates tech crowd
- NRA seeks to block gun magazine ban
- Lanza’s father says he wishes son was never born