S. Sudan peace talks to open in Ethiopia
JUBA, South Sudan — Negotiators from South Sudan's two warring sides arrived on Wednesday in Ethiopia for peace talks, and a U.N. official urged both forces to bring the world's newest country “back from the brink.”
Fighting continued in Bor, a gateway city to the capital of Juba, a government official said. Bor is 75 miles from Juba.
Bor, the capital of Jonglei state, is the center of ethnically-based violence stemming from the political rivalry between President Salva Kiir and ousted Vice President Riek Machar, the rebel leader accused of mounting a failed coup attempt.
Kiir declared a state of emergency in Jonglei and Unity, two states where rebel forces have gained the upper hand in recent fighting.
Machar said Tuesday he would send his forces from Bor to Juba, but that threat was played down by Hilde Johnson, the U.N. representative in South Sudan.
“On Jan. 1, the country is at a fork in the road, but it can still be saved from further major escalation of violence,” she said.
Johnson urged Kiir and Machar to use the new talks to move toward peace, adding: “They can still pull the country back from the brink.”
The fighting has killed more than 1,000 people, the U.N. says.
Pro-Machar forces in Bor appear to be taking defensive positions, Johnson said. The fighting in Bor has displaced about 60,000 people, making it the latest humanitarian crisis in South Sudan. The International Red Cross said the road from Bor to the nearby Awerial area was lined with people waiting for boats so they could cross the Nile River.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Federal appeals court appears divided on Obama’s immigrant deportation shield
- Shuster admits to ‘personal relationship’ with airline industry lobbyist
- Collection gives insight into Oklahoma City federal building bomber McVeigh
- Truck carrying 13.7M bees overturns
- Scientists: Oil spill has harmed health of Gulf of Mexico
- Accused terror plotter pleads not guilty in Ohio
- Sunken carrier used in atomic bomb tests found off Calif.
- Social media makes it difficult for ‘hero’ to stay anonymous
- Work crew triggers Calif. blast
- Federal judge who blocked Obama immigration order painted as unbiased
- Some civil rights groups say loss of standardized exams will hurt disadvantaged