Ex-Homeland Security chief Napolitano not on board with clemency for Snowden
WASHINGTON — The former head of the Department of Homeland Security said Edward Snowden doesn't deserve clemency for exposing the broad reach of U.S. surveillance programs.
Janet Napolitano, who left the post in August to become president of the University of California system, said on NBC's “Meet the Press” that Snowden's leaks have hurt the United States. She rejected calls made in editorials by The New York Times and London's Guardian newspapers that Snowden, now living under temporary asylum in Russia, be granted clemency.
The United States has charged Snowden with theft and espionage for leaking documents to publications last year that revealed the breadth of the spying managed by the National Security Agency, where he worked as a contractor.
Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican who has been critical of the NSA's activities, said Snowden should return to the United States to go on trial for his actions.
“I think personally, he probably would come home for some penalty of a few years in prison,” Paul said on ABC's “This Week” program. “In the end, history is going to judge that he revealed great abuses of our government and great abuses of our intelligence community.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Experts skeptical of N.D.’s new oil train safety checks
- Appalachian miners wiped out by coal glut they can’t reverse
- Global warming is slowing down the circulation of the oceans — with potentially dire consequences
- Obama vetoes union election bill; streamlined election process to move forward
- Police: Prisoner who stole gun, fled hospital found in D.C.
- Indiana officials try to quell backlash over religious freedom law
- Mining for tourists? A dubious economic savior in Appalachia
- Military leaders leery of letting in transgenders
- Maryland might owe federal government millions for health care exchange
- Florida church bus crash kills 8
- Report: Prepare to drill for oil in Arctic