Gulf War treatment not widely copied
By USA Today
Published: Tuesday, Jan. 7, 2014, 9:18 p.m.
WASHINGTON — As Department of Veterans Affairs physician Nancy Klimas told an agency panel on Tuesday about the many successful ways her clinic has been treating Gulf War illness, veterans have responded with a combination of hope and anger.
The hope derives from her clinic appearing to be making headway in using research-based methods to treat veterans with the disease, which consists of symptoms ranging from headaches to memory loss to chronic fatigue. It plagues one in four of the 697,000 veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf War against Iraq.
The anger arises because, although Klimas had been using at least some of her methods for a decade, none of them have been disseminated throughout the VA system for use in other clinics. Her testimony was part of the ongoing fight between Gulf War veterans, who believe the government is ignoring physical causes for their ailments, and the VA, which has been reluctant to support the veterans' claims.
Klimas heads the Institute for Neuro Immune Medicine at Nova Southeastern University in Miami, and she leads Gulf War Illness research at the VA Medical Center in Miami. She said she has asked her patients to be their own advocates because many physicians don't believe the illness is anything but psychiatric.
Others, Klimas said, don't have time to read the training manual VA put out to help them care for Gulf War veterans, don't have more than 15 minutes to deal with each patient or don't know how to refer them to specialty clinics where they can get care — and some simply don't care to learn.
“That was a great presentation, but I can't resist adding that this information has been in the hands of Dr. Klimas for 12 years,” said Jim Binns, chairman of the Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses, which met with VA officials Tuesday.
For 23 years, Gulf War veterans have argued they were exposed to toxins, such as pesticides, insect repellents, anti-nerve agent pills and nerve agents that caused them to be sick. They've said they do not believe their ailments are related to stress because of the war's short duration and because the majority of troops were not exposed to the fighting. But until 1997, the VA focused on psychological disorders and not research to determine physical causes.
In 1997, Congress mandated Binns' committee after a congressional report found that the efforts to find causes and treatments for Gulf War illness by government agencies were “irreparably flawed.”
Binns said Klimas' use of research to form a plan to treat veterans is what should have happened at the top level.
Robert Jesse, the VA's principal deputy undersecretary for health, said the agency was trying to develop a “medical home” program that would allow doctors to spend more time with specialty cases, such as those involving Gulf War Illness.
“This is a wholesale change in how we're approaching care in VA,” Jesse said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hearing to determine fate of sergeant accused of killing 2 deaf Iraqi youths
- Images best of readied D-Day ships
- Mo. mayor steps down over anti-Semitic comments
- Shale oil, gas drilling boom wins favor with labor unions, thwarting environmentalists
- 69% back birth control mandate
- Mumps outbreak among Ohio’s largest
- IRS awards millions in bonuses to its people who don’t pay taxes
- Precautions lack year since fatal blast at plant
- Obama surveys mudslide devastation
- Gun background checks miss fugitives
- Little toxicity data exists for tainted W.Va. water