Boehner: U.S. needs to help Iraq in battle against al-Qaida
WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner said on Thursday that the United States should provide more equipment and other aid to the Iraqi government in its battle against al-Qaida, but he ruled out a reintroduction of troops for now.
The Republican leader said President Obama must get more involved in helping Iraq as it seeks to reclaim two cities, Fallujah and Ramadi, overrun by al-Qaida fighters. Boehner said America has a vital national interest in Iraq and warned the progress made by American forces before troops were withdrawn after nine years of war is being threatened.
“I think the president himself ought to take a more active role in dealing with the issues in Iraq,” said Boehner, R-Ohio. “Secondly, we need to get equipment to the Iraqis and other services that would help them battle this counterterrorism effort that they're attempting to do. There are things that we can do to help the Iraqis that do not involve putting U.S. troops on the ground.”
Pressed on whether he thought U.S. troops should be sent back to Iraq, Boehner said he did not think “that is called for at this point in time.”
The Obama administration has ruled out sending American troops back in, but has been delivering missiles to help bolster Iraqi forces, and more are on the way.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Man guilty in Florida A&M University band hazing death
- FCC chairman floats ‘hybrid’ ruling on net neutrality
- Hospital: Girl, 14, dies after Washington state school shooting
- Space tourism rattled by test flight explosion of Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShipTwo
- NYPD’s highest black official quits
- Designer of ‘Operation’ game short of surgery cash
- New York agrees to swift settlement with family of Marine who died in jail cell
- Federal civil rights charges called ‘unlikely’ in Ferguson shooting
- Maryland drivers scurry to grab cash
- Quarantine lifted, Maine nurse given right to roam
- Medicare paid for drug coverage of patients who had died, investigators say