In a jam over traffic snarl on bridge, New Jersey Gov. Christie fires aide, adviser
TRENTON, N.J. —- He was “betrayed,” “humiliated,” “saddened” and “blindsided.”
“I come out here today to apologize to the people of New Jersey,” Gov. Chris Christie said Thursday, shortly before he announced the firing of one of his senior aides and the dismissal of a close political adviser after they were linked a day earlier to an apparent political vendetta.
During a nearly two-hour Statehouse news conference packed with TV crews and reporters, Christie took question after question over a plot allegedly designed to punish the Democratic mayor of Fort Lee — who did not endorse the Republican governor's re-election in November — by causing massive traffic jams in September onto the George Washington Bridge.
Emails and texts released Wednesday pointed to involvement by a deputy chief of staff, Bridget Anne Kelly; Christie's former campaign manager, Bill Stepien; and two of his appointees to the Port Authority, Bill Baroni and David Wildstein.
“I am embarrassed and humiliated by the conduct of some of the people on my team,” Christie said. Later, describing his emotions, he said: “I am a very sad person today.”
It was a day that cast Christie in the national limelight — but not the kind he is used to. The Republican governor, who has been viewed as a likely candidate for the presidency in 2016, saw his stature rise after trouncing Democratic state Sen. Barbara Buono in a 22-point blowout in November.
This time, CNN fixed its cameras on a contrite Christie, telecasting his repeated expressions of regret — “I am heartbroken,” “I am extraordinarily disappointed” — as well as his assurances that he played no role in the scheme that shut access lanes from Fort Lee to the bridge, delaying school buses and emergency responders.
Later in the day, Christie traveled to Fort Lee to apologize to Mayor Mark Sokolich — a man whom Christie said earlier he would not have been able to recognize “until yesterday, when I saw his picture on TV.”
And there was a new question: Had he considered resigning?
“Oh, God, no,” Christie responded. “That's a crazy question, man.”
While he acknowledged there would be “some crisis in confidence,” he said, “I don't believe I've lost the trust of the people of New Jersey.”
Democrats said they planned Friday to release hundreds of pages of additional documents.
Previously, Christie had denied any involvement by his staff in the situation and dismissed the possibility of any plot.
Wildstein and Baroni resigned from the Port Authority last month after Baroni testified before a legislative committee that the lane closures had been ordered by Wildstein as part of a traffic study.
Documents subpoenaed by lawmakers and obtained by reporters Wednesday showed that in an email Aug. 13, Kelly wrote to Wildstein: “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee.”
“Got it,” Wildstein immediately responded.
In a text message sent during the closures, an unidentified person said of children stuck in traffic: “They are the children of Buono voters,” referring to Christie's opponent in the election.
Christie said the “political overtones” and language of the messages are unacceptable. In one email, Stepien called Sokolich an “idiot.”
“Ultimately, I am responsible for what happens under my watch: the good and the bad,” Christie said.
The U.S. Attorney's Office said Thursday that it is reviewing the incident to determine whether federal laws were involved.
Christie said at the news conference that he had “absolutely nothing to hide.”
Although saying he was caught off guard by the disclosures, Christie said he had previously pressed his staff on the bridge incident as questions continued to arise.
Before a news conference four weeks ago — when he pledged no involvement by his staff in the situation —Christie said he told staff members that they had one hour to report any new information. No one did, he said.
“I'm incredibly loyal to my people,” he said. “And I expect in return their honesty and their candor and their loyalty.”
Of Kelly, he said, “I terminated her employment because she lied to me.”
Throughout the news conference, Christie emphasized the hurt he felt after getting a call at 8:50 a.m. Wednesday from his communications manager.
Christie, who said he had just finished a workout at home with his personal trainer, looked on his iPad and saw a report posted by the Bergen Record about the 22 pages of documents that surfaced Wednesday. Other reports quickly followed.
“You can only imagine, as I was standing there in my bedroom with my iPad ... how incredibly sad and betrayed I felt,” he said.
As the disclosures exploded into a national news story, Christie remained silent for much of Wednesday. Late in the day, he issued a statement via email saying he was “outraged and saddened.”
Though he remained out of the public eye when the news broke, Christie said he responded quickly — a point he repeated Thursday. By 7 p.m. Wednesday, Christie said, Stepien had been asked to leave his organization.
By 9 a.m. Thursday, Christie said, he had fired Kelly. “That's pretty swift action for a day's work.”
Christie said he did not talk to Stepien or Kelly about the issue before firing them, saying he did not want to interfere with the ongoing legislative investigation.
Of the Democrats leading the investigation, Christie said, “They have every right to do what they're doing, given what was revealed yesterday. I'm certainly not going to question that.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Scientists hope tiny robotic bee’s big dreams take flight
- Police say couple wanted Amish girls for slaves