Marines honored for fatal sacrifices in Afghanistan
Marine Capt. Matthew P. Manoukian, (left) and Staff Sgt. Sky R. Mote gave their lives in a firefight in Afghanistan that cleared the way for their comrades to escape an insider attack.
Photo by AP
CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. — Two Marines killed in an insider attack in Afghanistan were set to be posthumously awarded the Navy Cross, the military's second-highest honor.
Capt. Matthew Manoukian and Staff Sgt. Sky Mote were to be honored on Saturday afternoon in a ceremony at Camp Pendleton, Calif.
The men were killed in 2012 when an Afghan police officer armed with an AK-47 burst into their military outpost in Helmand province and opened fire, killing a Marine.
Manoukian and Mote confronted the intruder and shot back, allowing other Marines to escape, the Marine Corps said.
Manoukian, a 29-year-old team commander, was working in the operations center when he heard shots tearing through the walls. He grabbed his pistol and fired at the police officer while directing others to safety.
Mote, a 27-year-old explosive ordnance disposal technician, was working nearby and ran to the operations center.
“In his final act of bravery, he boldly remained in the open and engaged the shooter, no less than five meters in front of him,” the Marine Corps said.
The men were the 15th and 16th Marines to receive the Navy Cross, the Navy's highest honor and the military's second-highest honor.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.