Share This Page

California blaze keeps hundreds from homes

| Saturday, Jan. 18, 2014, 7:18 p.m.
REUTERS
Smoke is illuminated but the Colby Fire in Glendora, Calif., late on Friday, Jan. 17, 2014.

GLENDORA, Calif. — A wildfire in the suburbs of Los Angeles was a smoldering shadow of its former self on Saturday, but hundreds of residents of a foothill neighborhood remained evacuated, and extremely dangerous fire conditions were expected to last well into the night.

Other evacuees returned on Friday evening to their homes, this time in Azusa, 25 miles northeast of downtown Los Angeles, a day after their neighbors in Glendora did the same. But one Azusa neighborhood known as Mountain Cove remained too close to the remaining fire, so its residents would have to spend an extra night away, Los Angeles County emergency officials said.

Flare-ups occurred within the burn area of about 3 square miles, but none escaped the perimeter, said Mike Wakowski, commander of the multi-agency firefighting force. Containment was estimated at 30 percent.

“Things are progressing nicely,” Wakowski said. “It's looking pretty good.”

Crews took advantage of the lower temperatures and wind conditions overnight to set backfires to take out potential fuel for the blaze and continued to mop up on Saturday.

The fire erupted early Thursday in the Angeles National Forest when Santa Ana winds hit a campfire that authorities said was recklessly set by three men. Gusts quickly spread flames from the San Gabriel Mountains into Glendora and Azusa, where 3,700 people had to evacuate at the fire's peak.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.