House GOP leaders may let young illegal immigrants be citizens
WASHINGTON — House Republican leaders announced immigration reform guidelines on Thursday that offer citizenship to some young immigrants brought to the United States illegally as children but provide “no special pathway to citizenship” for their parents or other undocumented adult immigrants.
Undocumented immigrants who came here as adults would be able to gain legal status that would allow them to remain in the United States without fear of deportation, according to a one-page “Standards for Immigration Reform.” It is not clear if they would be barred from ever becoming citizens or could somehow earn their way to citizenship through traditional channels, such as being sponsored by an employer or a relative who is a U.S. citizen.
The standards were revealed at a House Republican retreat on the eastern shore of Maryland. They offer the first concrete look at what GOP leaders are thinking as they begin their efforts to persuade rank-and-file House Republicans to take up immigration reform this year.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who helped craft the comprehensive immigration reform bill passed last year by the Senate, said he was encouraged by House leaders' efforts.
The preamble to the list of standards reasserts the GOP leaders' stance that they will not consider the comprehensive immigration reform bill passed by the Senate.
Here is a look at some of what the Republican leaders are proposing:
• Young immigrants: Undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children should not be punished for their parents' mistakes. Those who meet certain eligibility requirements and serve honorably in the U.S. military or obtain a college degree should be able to become legal residents and citizens.
• Legal status: There would be no “special path to citizenship” for undocumented immigrants who entered the United States illegally or overstayed their visas. They could earn legal status and stay in the United States if they “admit their culpability, pass rigorous background checks, pay significant fines and back taxes, develop proficiency in English and American civics, and be able to support themselves and their families (without access to public benefits).”
• Border security: Border security and interior enforcement of immigration laws must come first. The results must be verifiable. There would be a “zero tolerance policy” for people who cross the border illegally or overstay their visas after reform is enacted.
• Visas: The guidelines call for a fully functioning entry-exit system that uses biometric technology to verify people's identities, track fraud and find visitors who overstay their visas.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- White House ricochets in nonprofits’ birth control coverage fray
- NASA expected to hire private rocket
- Weight loss differs between the sexes
- U.S. could have done better, says brother of slain journalist
- Hackers hit 25,000 government workers
- Don’t eat tuna, Consumer Reports tells mothers-to-be
- Retailers warned about software
- Kentucky firefighters recovering from ice stunt shocks
- His murder-arson conviction overturned, man walks free 24 years later
- Scathing report says college trustees fail in mission
- Ferguson residents fear return of rioting, looting