Republicans want to seize natural gas export chance
Published: Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2014, 6:24 p.m.
WASHINGTON — Republican lawmakers urged the Obama administration on Tuesday to approve more ports for exporting surging supplies of natural gas, saying that fuel-thirsty countries could look to other producers if Washington does not act this year.
Reps. Fred Upton and Ed Whitfield, two Republicans, introduced a report that said the window of opportunity for American natural gas exports will not remain open indefinitely.
President Obama highlighted the role that natural gas has played in cutting greenhouse gas emissions in his State of the Union address last week. The Department of Energy has been considering more than 20 applications for companies to export natural gas to countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, such as Japan and India.
Republicans, however, are frustrated with the pace of approvals. The DOE has approved five applications since 2011, and the last one, for Freeport LNG, was in November.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- SpaceX supply ship makes Easter cargo delivery to space station
- Obama administration delays decision on Keystone XL pipeline
- Judge strikes down Minnesota’s anti-coal law as unconstitutional
- Iranian envoy officially blocked by law
- Medicaid paid $12M for Illinois dead, audit finds
- Grandmother left vengeful note in boys’ slayings, then committed suicide, police say
- Wyatt Earp gun sells for $225K at auction
- Records exonerate ‘X-Men’ director, attorney says
- Colorado deaths stoke marijuana worries
- Recovery expert believes wreckage of missing plane located
- Casino sues gambler Phil Ivey, claiming $9.6M cheat