Administration's marijuana stand hazy
WASHINGTON — Figuring out where the Obama administration stands on marijuana is starting to get as confusing as remembering which one is Cheech and which one is Chong.
The White House-run Office of National Drug Control Policy considers marijuana a dangerous and harmful drug. And the Drug Enforcement Administration labels it a top-tier illegal drug under federal law.
But President Obama, an acknowledged pot smoker in his younger days, recently told The New Yorker magazine that he doesn't perceive marijuana as any more dangerous than alcohol and said it is “important” that the legalization of marijuana in Colorado and Washington state go forward.
So what is the government's position? Members of Congress pressed Michael Botticelli, deputy director of the drug-control agency, on that question Tuesday during a House hearing.
“The administration continues to oppose attempts legalize marijuana and other drugs,” Botticelli told a House Oversight subcommittee.
The panel's chairman, Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., described the administration's position on marijuana as “schizophrenic” with the drug control policy office and the DEA clearly being against legalization while the president has been far more permissive in his statements.
Obama has yet to give a full-throated endorsement to the two states' legalization. He told The New Yorker “it's important for it to go forward because it's important for society not to have a situation in which a large portion of people have at one time or another broken the law and only a select few get punished.” He added that he doesn't think smoking marijuana is a good idea.
James Capra, chief of operations for the DEA, told a Senate panel last month that “going down the path to legalization in this country is reckless and irresponsible.”
The Justice Department issued a policy memo last year that essentially pledges to steer clear of state-legal marijuana businesses as long as they follow a series of strict guidelines. While the memo doesn't give carte blanche to would-be marijuana entrepreneurs, it was received as an encouraging development by the growing legal pot market.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Los Angeles police kill man in struggle captured on video
- Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
- Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology
- Nurse who survived Ebola virus says Dallas hospital failed her
- Suspects’ search of victims’ homes OK’d in Colorado
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- 2 W.Va. coal operators sentenced in scheme
- Deadly bacteria release spurs concern at Louisiana lab
- GOP senators pledge help if court bars health care law subsidies
- No signs of deal on Homeland funding