After 18 hours, Colorado boy saved
ARVADA, Colo. — Officers in suburban Denver on Tuesday fatally shot a 34-year-old man who had held a boy hostage for nearly 18 hours.
Don Pooley, who had a criminal record and was wanted for a parole violation, barricaded himself and the 13-year-old in a house, and hostage negotiators left items for him at the front door, Arvada police said. When Pooley tried to retrieve them, he was shot and killed.
Members of a SWAT team immediately rescued the boy.
Arvada police Chief Don Wick said the standoff began in the residential neighborhood north of Denver when police responded to a domestic dispute call involving a man and woman at 5:30 p.m. Monday. The man fled, then forced his way into a nearby home and took as a hostage the 13-year-old, who was home alone, police said.
The boy's mother and brother arrived a short time later but were not taken hostage.
Police negotiated with the hostage-taker, and aware that he was watching media reports, released few details during the standoff, other than to say the hostage and suspect didn't know each other. The suspect called some media outlets, including the Denver Post. Police asked that the content of the conversation not be reported and asked local television stations at the scene not to air live footage of a SWAT team taking positions next to the house shortly before the standoff ended about 11 a.m.
Pooley had been released on parole on Oct. 2 but had been listed as “absconded” on Jan. 10 after failing to meet with a parole officer, Colorado Department of Corrections spokesman Roger Hudson said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.