Taxpayers' tab for ex-Detroit mayor's defense: nearly $814K
DETROIT — The public paid more than $1 million for the years-long legal defense of former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick and his father, according to figures released on Wednesday by a federal court.
The Kilpatricks qualified for attorneys at the public's expense based on their income and assets at the time they were indicted.
Kwame Kilpatrick now is serving a 28-year prison sentence for corruption. His total legal tab, including attorney fees and other costs, was $813,806. Slightly more than half of that amount went to his longtime lawyer, James Thomas.
Thomas said he was paid $125 an hour, the rate for court-appointed counsel in Detroit federal court. The defense began in summer 2010, when Kilpatrick was first indicted for tax crimes. Prosecutors followed up with many additional charges, including racketeering conspiracy, and the five-month trial didn't start until fall 2012.
Bernard Kilpatrick's legal costs added up to $352,777.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ticks reduce moose population in northern states
- Pentagon program seeks to retain U.S. technological edge against foreign rivals
- 121 tourists stranded on schooner near Statue of Liberty
- Scope of Chrysler’s latest SUV recall questioned
- Threats from Mexican cartels lead protesters to scrap immigration rallies, organizer says
- Authorities in California search for 5 jail escapees
- Pope picks moderate to be Chicago archbishop
- Egyptian Bary admits links to 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Africa
- Hurricane shattered Charleston, S.C., tested mayor 25 years ago
- DHS headquarters’ planning goes awry
- New DNA testing in twins welcomed by prosecutors