Bill Clinton scandal won't be a campaign issue, Romney says
WASHINGTON — Mitt Romney suggested on Sunday that the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal will not be an issue if Hillary Rodham Clinton runs for president again.
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., in recent weeks has pressed the issue, citing Bill Clinton's “predatory” behavior and suggesting Americans should think twice about putting him in the White House again as the spouse of a president.
But Romney said on NBC's “Meet the Press” that Hillary Clinton will be judged on her own merits. “I don't think Bill Clinton is as relevant as Hillary Clinton if Hillary Clinton decides to run for president,” the 2012 Republican presidential nominee said. “I think her record is what will be judged upon, not the record of her husband.”
Romney, though, said that Bill Clinton “embarrassed” the nation with his behavior. “But I don't think that's Hillary Clinton's to explain,” Romney said.
“He breached his responsibility, I think, as an adult and as a leader in his relationship, and I think that's very unfortunate,” Romney added.
Paul has been careful to avoid directly attacking Hillary Clinton for her husband's affair, focusing on the issue more as a counterpoint to Democrats' allegations that the GOP is waging a “war on women.” But the attacks suggest Paul might focus on the issue as a 2016 presidential candidate.
As for his own potential 2016 candidacy, Romney continued to say that it is not happening.
When it was noted that Ronald Reagan ran for president three times, Romney had a retort: “I'm not Ronald Reagan. I think that's been pointed out to me before.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Former GOP House Speaker Hastert indicted in banking violation
- Dinosaurs may have been warm-blooded after all
- Pataki formally opens White House bid, 8th from GOP
- California man beaten by deputies on video faces charges
- Tar balls wash ashore in California
- Detroit-area police officer to stand trial in driver’s beating
- Baltimore gets bloodier as arrests drop post-riots
- EPA’s temporary pesticide-free zones would protect commercial honeybees
- North Carolina governor to veto marriage abstention bill
- Justice Department seeks info on medical scope in superbug outbreaks
- Texas rivers threaten cities downstream