25 snared in $75M Medicaid fraud case
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, Feb. 20, 2014, 9:12 p.m.
WASHINGTON — Twenty-five people were charged on Thursday with obtaining at least $75 million in fraudulent Medicaid payments from the District of Columbia government.
Federal prosecutors said the series of cases add up to the largest health care fraud in the city's history.
The alleged schemes, which prosecutors said were similar but not necessarily part of a unified conspiracy, involved bogus claims for home care services — a category of Medicaid claims that has grown dramatically in the city during the past eight years.
The uptick in billings for home care — from $40 million in 2006 to $280 million last year — was part of what tipped off authorities to illegal activity, said U.S. Attorney Ronald Machen.
“We concluded that much of the growth was due to aggressive networks of fraudsters paying kickbacks to beneficiaries to manufacture false claims for nonexistent services,” Machen said. “Medicaid fraud in the District of Columbia is at epidemic levels.”
Prosecutors say many of the defendants persuaded patients to fake illnesses or injuries so that they could bill Medicaid for home care services, which they didn't receive. Some of those patients received kickbacks, authorities said, although no patients have been charged. Those charged include the owners of home care firms and nurse staffing agencies; home care aides; and recruiters who signed up patients.
Florence Bikundi, 51, of Bowie, Md., owner of a home care agency who had lost her nursing license and was barred from participating in Medicaid, billed the city for $75 million in Medicaid payments by using aliases, prosecutors said.
Among her properties seized were millions of dollars from 46 bank accounts, a home valued at $927,000 and five luxury vehicles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Study says regular pot use affects the brain
- 150-plus birds seized at fighting venue in W.Va.
- Authorities say they have trove of evidence against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in Boston Marathon bombing
- Probation officer of suspect in slaying of North Allegheny graduate resigns
- Dangers of Heartbleed bug grow every day
- Subsitute for Pap smear scorned; overtreatment cited
- Court upholds EPA emissions restrictions
- Public employees union fights outside IRS collectors
- U.S. to have front-row seat for lunar eclipse
- Tax refund scam nearly impossible to stop
- Ohio geologists link quakes to fracking