Rescue of 5-month-old stops traffic in Florida
By The Miami Herald
Published: Friday, Feb. 21, 2014, 8:45 p.m.
MIAMI — It was a sight that jarred motorists on a busy Miami expressway.
Traffic suddenly came to a standstill about 2:30 p.m. on Thursday and a woman sprang from her car, holding a baby, screaming for help.
Pamela Rauseo, 37, of West Kendall, Fla., was frantic: Her 5-month-old nephew, Sebastian de la Cruz, was turning blue.
Lucila Godoy, 34, of Miami left her 3-year-old in her car to help Rauseo perform CPR on the unconscious infant, born prematurely with respiratory issues.
Miami Herald photographer Al Diaz, was stopped right behind Rauseo.
He heard Rauseo “screaming that the baby can't breathe.”
Diaz quickly jogged through traffic lanes to summon more help and found Sweetwater police Officer Amauris Bastidas, who ran to the scene and took over CPR for Godoy, performing chest pumps while Rauseo breathed into the baby's mouth.
“I lifted him up in the air and moved him up and down,” Bastidas said. “He started breathing and crying. Then he started not breathing again.”
Anthony Trim and Alvaro Tonanez, Miami-Dade firefighters, were also stuck in the traffic and jumped out of their separate cars. They found Sebastian breathing, but barely.
An ambulance arrived moments later and rushed the baby to a hospital, where he remains in stable condition.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- Maryland bill would link criminal, gun owners data
- Gillibrand sex assault bill halted by fellow Democrat
- Sex-crimes prosecutor accused in groping
- Shuster plans oversight for DUI program
- Health marketplace targets not signing up, survey shows
- Volunteers reconstruct World War II bomber plane
- Traffic cameras rejected in Ohio ruling
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Mummified remains found in foreclosed home
- Crisis stymies Obama getaway