Albuquerque leaders pan 'Cops' filming plan
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, Feb. 24, 2014, 8:57 p.m.
ALBUQUERQUE — More Albuquerque leaders want to stop the reality show “COPS” from being filmed around the city and say the series is worse for Albuquerque's image than “Breaking Bad.”
At least the fictional show filmed in Albuquerque brought jobs and tourists to the city, officials said.
City Council President Ken Sanchez and fellow Councilor Don Harris announced they will introduce a resolution asking Bernalillo County Sheriff Dan Houston to reconsider his recent decision to allow the Spike TV show to film deputies in April.
“The COPS television series sensationalizes criminal activity and focuses only on the seedy and negative aspects of the community it is filming in,” the resolution reads.
The councilors join Mayor Richard Berry and others leaders who have recently voiced their opposition to bringing “COPS” to the Albuquerque area on ground that it would paint a negative picture of the city and might hurt economic development.
“All families have issues, all communities have issues and everybody knows you don't advertise those things,” Harris told reporters. “We think there's no reason to be putting our worst foot forward.”
Harris said the cheaply-produced reality series is much worse than AMC's “Breaking Bad,” because the fictional drama brought jobs to Albuquerque.
“Breaking Bad,” which ended last year and was filmed in Albuquerque, followed former high school teacher Walter White, played by Bryan Cranston. White produced methamphetamine with a former student, Jesse Pinkman, played by Aaron Paul.
Despite its dark themes, the show garnered wide-support from Albuquerque elected officials. The city's visitors' bureau even helped promote the show with viewing parties and a website map of the show's popular locations.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Wikileaks founder teases about more secrets to be released
- Sullivan case still relied on in libel claims
- Expats renounce citizenship over U.S. tax hassles
- Oklahoma governor’s daughter regrets wearing Native American headdress
- Parents of ‘spoiled’ teen urge her to return home
- Obama losing close adviser to end 9 years of service
- Massachusetts chemist acted alone in faking test results, report says
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Former National Security Agency contractor Snowden’s leaks to cost billions, take years to fix
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- Immigrant detainees on hunger strike