1st 9/11-related trial in U.S. unfolds
WASHINGTON — Weeks after he took office, President Obama met privately with 40 grieving Americans, many clutching photographs of loved ones lost in terrorist attacks.
The president told them that he would close the Guantanamo Bay military prison within the year and put many of the detainees there on trial in the United States, where justice would be swifter.
Five years later, the first and probably only federal court trial of a Sept. 11-related case will start with jury selection on Monday in a U.S. District courthouse in lower Manhattan, not far from where the World Trade Center stood.
In addition to being the first opportunity for Obama to fulfill that 2009 pledge, it will likely be the only chance for New Yorkers, the community most damaged in the worst terror attack in U.S. history, to have such a trial on their home turf, decided by a jury of New Yorkers.
Obama's plans to relocate other Guantanamo detainees, most notably confessed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four others accused in the plot, ran into congressional roadblocks that prevented the president from trying them in New York and closing the Cuba detention facility as he promised.
But when Sulaiman abu Ghaith, 48, Osama bin Laden's son-in-law, who is accused of being a top al-Qaida propagandist, was arrested last year, the Justice Department brushed aside pressure to send him to Guantanamo and began proceedings in New York, partly as a test case to demonstrate that high-profile terrorism trials could be handled safely and efficiently in the United States.
Abu Ghaith's trial has moved far faster than in the military process at Guantanamo Bay, where only a handful of tribunals have been completed. Half of the remaining 150 detainees have been cleared for release yet remain locked up, and the other half are being held indefinitely as enemy combatants. Mohammed and his fellow defendants have been in custody for 11 years with no trial in sight.
Federal prosecutors in New York are hoping to prove that justice can move faster there. They are seeking life in prison with no parole for abu Ghaith, who is accused of being an al-Qaida leader and calling for more attacks after Sept. 11. Prosecutors did not seek the death penalty because abu Ghaith is not accused of directly planning or carrying out acts of terrorism.
According to the government, soon after the twin towers fell, abu Ghaith began encouraging Muslims to battle the United States
“Jihad is a duty,” he proclaimed. “Americans must know that the storm of airplanes will not stop, God willing, and there are thousands of young people who are as keen about death as Americans are about life.”
Retired New York Deputy fire Chief Jim Riches, whose son, firefighter Jimmy Riches, died at the World Trade Center, said he is eager to attend the abu Ghaith trial in New York.
“This is where they committed the crime,” said Riches, who has attended hearings at Guantanamo Bay and criticized those tribunals for their frustratingly slow pace. “We'll get justice here. I'll be dead before there's a trial down there.”
But despite the president's assurance that the federal court system is a better place to administer justice, many relatives — and politicians — question whether terrorism suspects should be prosecuted in the United States. Some have said foreign terrorism suspects should not benefit from the same legal due-process rights afforded American citizens. They worry detainees will exploit the court system and use trials as public platforms to spread their ideology. They say those accused of war crimes belong in the military legal system at Guantanamo Bay, safely away from American. shores.
“I just don't like the thought they would even be allowed to be here, where they hurt so many people,” said Rosaleen Tallon, another parent of a firefighter lost on 9/11, Sean Patrick Tallon.
For the Justice Department, much is riding on the trial and verdict in abu Ghaith's case. Anything short of a life sentence could be seen as a failure.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S., Cuba patching torn relations with historic accord
- $1.5B more a year — from fees tacked onto phone bills — earmarked for faster Internet
- Republican lawmakers vow to block confirmation of any potential ambassador to Cuba
- California downpours arrive with lightning
- Lifting limits on Cuba a boon for U.S.
- Study: At least 786 child abuse victims died despite being on protective services’ radar
- Castle doctrine doesn’t hold up in Montana murder case
- Airships are Army’s new eyes in the sky to detect, destroy missiles
- Warren’s hangups over trade agenda threaten party ties
- 14 tied to Mass. pharmacy charged in meningitis outbreak that claimed 64
- Conn. dentist’s license suspended over death