Deaths from heroin, pain pills called 'urgent,' growing' crisis
Attorney General Eric Holder said the rise in deaths from overdoses of heroin and prescription painkillers are an “urgent and growing public health crisis,” in outlining a series of efforts by the Justice Department to combat the epidemic.
At a time of growing public acceptance of marijuana use, Holder is drawing attention to the negative consequences of heroin. In a video released early on Monday, Holder said heroin overdose deaths increased by 45 percent between 2006 and 2010.
“When confronting the problem of substance abuse, it makes sense to focus attention on the most dangerous types of drugs,” Holder said. “And right now, few substances are more lethal than prescription opiates and heroin.”
Holder added, “Addiction to heroin and other opiates — including certain prescription painkillers — is impacting the lives of Americans in every state, in every region, and from every background and walk of life — and all too often, with deadly results.”
Holder said the DEA is expanding its education programs for pharmacists and doctors, and urging first responders to carry naloxone, a drug that when administered quickly, can restore breathing to somebody suffering from a heroin overdose.
In Western Pennsylvania, authorities blamed a mix of heroin and the powerful painkiller fentanyl for causing two dozen drug overdose deaths this year. Some of the stamp bags of the combinations were labeled “Theraflu” and “Income Tax” and “Bud Ice.”Most of the deaths occurred between Jan. 4 and Jan. 29.
The victims predominantly were white men between the ages of 24 and 51, but the group had women and minorities, and city-dwellers and suburbanites.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.