D.C. mayor denies he knew of illegal 'shadow campaign'
WASHINGTON — District of Columbia Mayor Vincent Gray denies he knew of an off-the-books “shadow campaign” to support his 2010 bid and personally requested the funds from an influential district businessman, he said on Monday.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Atkinson disclosed the details in court when reading a document that described the activities of Jeffrey Thompson, the multimillionaire former owner of a well-connected accounting firm who pleaded guilty to two conspiracy charges.
The allegations against Gray were included in a document detailing crimes alleged against Thompson.
Gray told WRC-TV on Monday he was not involved or aware of illicit campaign activity, saying “these are absolute lies.”
The mayor said he thought all the fundraising for his campaign was being done in a legitimate way and that he thought Thompson wanted to conceal his donations to Gray for fear of retribution from former Mayor Adrian Fenty's administration.
According to the document, Gray met Thompson for dinner at the apartment of another conspirator in August 2011 and presented Thompson with a one-page budget of $425,000 needed for get-out-the-vote efforts. Thompson agreed to pay that amount by funneling it through another company, the document said.
During an earlier meeting with Thompson, he told the mayor that he would fund his campaign but that the contributions would not come from him or anyone associated with him, the document said. Thompson told Gray to say the money came from “Uncle Earl,” and after the meeting to discuss the shadow campaign, Gray thanked Thompson and referred to him as “uncle,” the document said.
Gray has not been charged with a crime and has denied any wrongdoing in the 2010 campaign.
U.S. Attorney Ronald Machen said in a statement: “Today's guilty plea pulls back the curtain on years of widespread corruption. With Mr. Thompson's cooperation, we have the opportunity to hold many wrongdoers accountable and to usher in a new era of honesty, integrity, and transparency in D.C. politics.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
- Tribune-Review poll: Cable news rises as network news falls
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Most young Republicans back legal marijuana
- Monarch butterflies find milkweed supply dwindles
- Dems keep blocking joint negotiations on immigration orders
- Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
- Several states in path of wintry blasts
- Inhofe reverses on transporation bill
- EPA ripped for evading request for information
- Hillary Clinton may have broken federal record-keeping laws, New York Times reports