House Speaker Boehner: Jobless aid extension won't work
WASHINGTON — Speaker of the House John Boehner said on Wednesday that a Senate plan to extend long-term unemployment benefits retroactively “is simply unworkable” once a state officials group warned of implementation problems.
The National Association of State Workforce Agencies wrote in a letter that some states may find the plan's verification requirements too costly and onerous, and could try to opt out.
The bill's requirements “would cause considerable delays in the implementation of the program and increased administrative issues and costs,” NASWA President Mark Henry wrote to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
The Senate is expected to vote in coming weeks on bipartisan legislation to renew the jobless benefits for the first five months of 2014 that would put an average of $300 per week into the hands of long-term unemployed workers. The checks would be retroactive to Dec. 29, 2013.
For Boehner, whose House Republican caucus has shown little interest in extending unemployment benefits, the letter from the state officials' group bolsters the case for opposing the Senate plan. He said it was “cause for serious concern.”
Boehner said Republicans still would look at an unemployment benefits extension bill from Democrats that is “fiscally responsible” and helps to make more private-sector jobs.
“There is no evidence that the bill being rammed through the Senate by Leader Reid meets that test, and according to these state directors, the bill is also simply unworkable,” Boehner said in a statement.
Reid's spokesman Adam Jentleson said Democrats believe that concerns raised by the state officals are “resolvable” and urged Boehner to help craft solutions.
“It is hard to imagine Speaker Boehner simply walking away from the thousands of people in Ohio who lost their jobs through no fault of their own and need this lifeline to make ends meet while they continue to look for work,” Jentleson said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Driver’s license ban for immigrant children ends in Nebraska
- Historic Martha’s Vineyard lighthouse moves inland
- Texas rivers threaten cities downstream
- Health care law’s supporters encounter resistance from federal judge
- EPA’s temporary pesticide-free zones would protect commercial honeybees
- Tar balls wash ashore in California
- FCC wants to extend $1.7B phone subsidy to broadband
- Justice Department seeks info on medical scope in superbug outbreaks
- Detroit-area police officer to stand trial in driver’s beating
- North Carolina governor to veto marriage abstention bill
- Amtrak cameras to view operators