Some families settle in North Texas 'affluenza' traffic deaths
DALLAS — The family of a North Texas teenager who killed four people in a drunken wreck has reached settlements with some, but not all, of the families of the teen's victims, court records show.
Ethan Couch was given 10 years of probation for intoxication manslaughter in a wreck last year that left several people severely injured. His case and sentence drew national attention because of a defense expert's testimony that Couch's parents had coddled him into a sense of irresponsibility — a condition the expert called “affluenza.”
Court records in Fort Worth indicate Couch's family has settled three lawsuits, including with families of three of the people killed: Breanna Mitchell, whose car had stopped on a rural Tarrant County road; and Hollie and Shelby Boyles, a mother and daughter who were trying to help.
The terms of those settlements were not disclosed.
The third settlement is with the parents of Isaiah McLaughlin, who was a 13-year-old passenger in the car of local minister Brian Jennings, who was also killed after stopping to help Mitchell.
According to a court filing, McLaughlin's family and attorneys will receive a $37,500 payment. The boy will get an annuity of about $13,000 a year for the next five years, as well as a $10,000 payment when he turns 25.
Couch was drunk and had prescription drugs in his system when he plowed his family's Ford pickup truck into the crowd of people helping Mitchell.
At least four lawsuits have not been settled, according to court records.
Jennings' widow and two children are still discussing a settlement. Also pending are cases brought by the families of Sergio Molina and Solaiman Mohmand, teens from suburban Keller who were riding in the bed of Couch's pickup and were severely injured in the crash, and Lucas McConnell, a 12-year-old passenger in Jennings' car.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Financial exec gets 8 years for fraud
- Judge clears way for revival of NSA wiretap suit
- World population of trees to people: 422 to 1, team finds
- U.S. Catholics at odds with church, survey finds
- 34th senator signs on to Iran nuclear deal, crumbling GOP’s hopes to override veto
- Army fully opens Ranger School to female soldiers
- Sasquatch sighting! Maine police say Bigfoot artist nabbed
- Man slain by police said to have had knife
- Brothers awarded $750K each for wrongful imprisonment
- Clerk aims to block Ky. governor’s order
- Baltimore officers on track for trial