Paul seeks panel to oversee domestic work of spy agencies
BERKELEY, Calif. — Sen. Rand Paul, one of the foremost critics of the government's domestic spying program, went to the birthplace of the free speech movement on Wednesday to deliver a searing indictment of the intelligence community and call for a sweeping congressional investigation of its activities.
Speaking just off the University of California, Berkeley, campus, the Kentucky Republican depicted an supercilious federal government prying into the most intimate reaches of people's lives: from the books they purchase to the medications they take for their ills.
“I say what you read or what you send in your email or your text messages is none of their damn business,” Paul said to whoops and applause from the friendly, largely youthful crowd of several hundred.
Paul said that on his return to Washington, he would call for forming a bipartisan committee — modeled after one that scrutinized CIA abuses in the 1970s — to conduct an unfettered examination of the country's spy agencies.
“It should watch the watchers,” he said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.