Share This Page

Florida police: Secret Service officer caused traffic accident

| Friday, March 28, 2014, 12:01 a.m.

A Secret Service officer suspected of drinking caused a late-night traffic accident in South Florida just 12 hours before President Obama arrived on March 7 for an education speech and a long weekend with his family, according to a police report.

The 27-year-old counter sniper, Mathew Reyes, had a “slight odor” of alcohol on his breath, and a police officer who responded to the scene administered a field sobriety test, the report said.

“No detection of impairment was observed,” according to the report.

A Florida Highway Patrol trooper responding to the accident in Islamorada released Reyes after citing him for failing to yield to oncoming traffic and ultimately causing the accident. The police report released on Thursday provides new details about the incident.

A Secret Service spokesman acknowledged the accident when first asked about it by The Washington Post on Wednesday and said the officer involved was not given a Breathalyzer test. Instead, he was given a pen-eye test, in which drivers are asked to follow a pen with their eyes as the officer moves it in the air, the spokesman said.

Under Florida law, it is illegal for adults older than 21 to drive with a blood-alcohol content of 0.08 percent or higher.

Reyes and a second officer, who was in the car, were sent home early from Obama's trip on reporting the incident to superiors, officials said.

Secret Service spokesman Ed Donovan said the two officers were sent home out of “an abundance of caution” because a police report had not been issued at that point.

He declined to say whether the officers were in violation of a rule forbidding any drinking within 10 hours of an assignment.

“There have been no personnel actions to date,” Donovan said. “There are ongoing investigations.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.