GM tells dealers to stop selling some Chevy Cruzes
DETROIT — General Motors Corp. has told dealers to stop selling about 21,000 Chevrolet Cruze compact cars from the 2013 and 2014 model years.
But the company won't say why.
The order covers Cruzes equipped with 1.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder gasoline engines. Spokesman Alan Adler said on Friday it includes about one-third of the Cruzes on dealer lots across the nation. At the end of February, GM had 63,714 Cruzes in dealer stock, according to Ward's AutoInfoBank.
Owners or general managers of nearly a dozen Pittsburgh-area Chevrolet dealers who were contacted in the afternoon by the Tribune-Review did not want to comment about GM's decision or how it would affect them.
Dealers say stop-sale orders are routine and almost always made to fix a safety problem. They received the order in an email on Thursday, but no reason was given. More information is expected on Monday.
The move occurs as GM deals with fallout from a delayed recall of 1.6 million older small cars to fix an ignition switch problem.
The Detroit company says the switches can slip out of the run position and shut down the engine. That causes loss of power steering and brakes and disables air bags.
GM says the problem has been linked to 31 crashes and at least a dozen deaths.
GM spokesmen said they don't have further details on the Cruze.
The stop-sale order was first reported by the trade publication Automotive News.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Judge orders W.Va. agency to release pollution data
- Coast Guard to seek billions to protect Arctic interests
- Man caught jumping White House fence
- Personal use of Secret Service agents on staffer’s behalf draws investigaton
- 4 private security guards convicted
- Coburn’s final ‘Wastebook’ tallies $25B in what he considers ‘pork’
- Academic scandal at University of North Carolina bigger than previously reported
- Social Security recipients to get increase in benefits
- Security at Capitol questioned
- Navy civilian goes on trial for diverting $2M to brother of his boss
- 8 arrested in post-game riots in Morgantown